The team doping directory

Statistics

• 20 years of existence
• 9 cases (51th out of 606 teams) involving 9 team members
• 0,45 cases per year (197th out of 606 teams)

Successive names

Year	Team	Category
1992	Panasonic - Sportlife	0
1991	Panasonic - Sportlife	1
1990	Panasonic - Sportlife	2
1989	Panasonic - Isostar	0
1988	Panasonic - Isostar	0
1987	Panasonic	0
1986	Panasonic - Merckx	2
1985	Panasonic	0
1984	Panasonic - Raleigh	0
1983	TI Raleigh - Campagnolo	0
1982	Ti-Raleigh - Campagnolo	0
1981	Ti Raleigh - Creda	2
1980	Ti Raleigh - Creda	0
1979	Ti Raleigh - Mc Gregor	0
1978	Ti Raleigh - Mc Gregor	0
1977	Ti - Raleigh	1
1976	Ti Raleigh - Campagnolo	1
1975	Ti - Raleigh	0
1974	Ti-Raleigh	0
1972	Ti Raleigh	0

List of team doping cases

Rider	Product	Race	Year	Penalization	Control
Planckaert Eddy	EPO	Critérium	1991	No	Aveux en 1998
Freuler Urs		Six jours de Munich	1990	Yes	Positive control
Theunisse Gert-Jan	Testosterone	La Flèche Wallonne	1990	Yes	Positive control
Peiper Allan		Tour de Belgique	1986	Yes	Absence at control
Winnen Peter	Testosterone	Tour de France	1986	No	Aveux en 1998
Maas Jo	Nortestostérone	Tour de Belgique	1981	Unknown	Positive control
Van Der Velde Johann	Nortestostérone	Liège-Bastogne-Liège	1981	Yes	Positive control
Knetemann Gerrie			1977	No	Positive control
Haritz Gunther		Tour of Spain	1976	Yes	Positive control

Other doping directories

Disclaimer

For a good understanding, the following should be kept in mind:

• We've done our best to piece together the history of the teams beyond their name changes. This would not have been possible without the considerable work of three websites: www.museociclismo.it, www.memoire-du-cyclisme.eu and www.velorooms.com.
• For each team, this list cannot be exhaustive. Indeed, our doping directory , from which the cases listed here are taken, is by nature incomplete. Moreover, we have not been able to precisely date some doping cases. As a result, these cannot be linked with certainty to such or such a team. They therefore do not appear in this list.
• By doping case, one must understand the positive tests, the reports of deficiency , the disciplinary, parliamentary or judicial inquiries or confessions. When we do not know the outcome, we indicate it in the penalty column. We also mention a number of cases for which there was no sanction. This is the case, for example, of late confessions which did not lead to any prosecution.

If you notice any errors or omissions, please let us know by sending a message here .