The teams doping directory

Splendor > Hitachi
Traduire en français


Last update - Logo www.cyclisme-dopage.com cyclisme-dopage.com

Statistics

Successive names

Year Team Category
1989 Hitachi 0
1988 Hitachi - Bosal - B.C.E. Snooker 0
1987 Hitachi - Marc - Rossin 2
1986 Hitachi - Marc - Splendor 3
1985 Hitachi - Splendor - Sunair 2
1984 Splendor - Mondial Moquette 0
1983 Splendor - Euro Shop 0
1982 Splendor - Wickes Bouwmarkt 0
1981 Splendor - Wickes Bouwmarkt - Europ Decor 0
1980 Splendor - Admiral - TV - Ekspress 0
1979 Splendor - Euro Soap 0
1978 Old Lord's - Splendor 0
1977 Carpenter - Splendor - Zeepcentral 0
1976 Zoppas - Splendor - Sinalco 0
1975 Splendor - Presutti - Notari 0

List of team doping cases

Rider Product Race Year Penalization Control
De Vos Hendrik Course de Blankenberge 1987 Unknown Positive control
Haex Jozef Créteil-Chaville 1987 Yes Positive control
Matthys Rudy Circuit de la Sarthe 1986 Yes Positive control
Tourne Stan Six jours de Bercy 1986 Yes Police investigation
Wampers Jean-Marie Gand-Wevelgem 1986 Unknown Positive control
Criquielion Claude Pervitin Championnats de Belgique 1985 No Positive control
Matthys Rudy Milan-San Remo 1985 Yes Positive control

Les annuaires du dopage

Annuaire du dopage par coureur Annuaire du dopage par course Annuaire des suspensions en cours

Disclaimer

For a good understanding, the following should be kept in mind:

  • We've done our best to piece together the history of the teams beyond their name changes. This would not have been possible without the considerable work of three websites: www.museociclismo.it, www.memoire-du-cyclisme.eu and www.velorooms.com.
  • For each team, this list cannot be exhaustive. Indeed, our doping directory , from which the cases listed here are taken, is by nature incomplete. Moreover, we have not been able to precisely date some doping cases. As a result, these cannot be linked with certainty to such or such a team. They therefore do not appear in this list.
  • By doping case, one must understand the positive tests, the reports of deficiency , the disciplinary, parliamentary or judicial inquiries or confessions. When we do not know the outcome, we indicate it in the penalty column. We also mention a number of cases for which there was no sanction. This is the case, for example, of late confessions which did not lead to any prosecution.

If you notice any errors or omissions, please let us know by sending a message here .