cyclisme-dopage.com - The team doping directory : Cedico > Ville de Charleroi > Marlux

Statistics

Year	Team	Category
2004	Chocolade Jacques Wincor - Nixdorf	2
2003	Marlux - Wincor Nixdorf	2
2002	Marlux - Ville de Charleroi	1
2001	Ville de Charleroi - New Systems	0
2000	Ville de Charleroi - New Systems	0
1999	Home Market - Ville de Charleroi	2
1998	Home Market - Ville de Charleroi	2
1997	Cedico - Ville de Charleroi	1
1996	Cedico - Ville de Charleroi	2
1995	Cedico - Sunjets - Ville de Charleroi	0

Rider	Product	Race	Year	Penalization	Control
Bruylandts Dave	EPO (Hématocrite 53%)	Grand Prix Pino Cerami	2004	Yes	Positive control
Cappelle Andy			2004	Yes	Positive control
Ardila Cano Mauricio Alberto	Hématocrite > 50%	Amstel Gold Race	2003	Yes	Positive control
Guilbert Charles			2003	No	Aveux en 2008
Lapage Laurenzo	Ephedrine	Six jours de Gand	2002	Yes	Positive control
Guilbert Charles	Syncortyl, néoton, caféine		1999	Yes	Police investigation
Hernandez Romeo	DHEA, trafic de produits dopants		1999	No	Enquête judiciaire
Hernandez Romeo	DHEA, trafic de produits dopants		1998	No	Enquête judiciaire
Laveur-Pedoux Jérôme	EPO		1998	Unknown	Aveux en 2000
Hernandez Romeo	DHEA, trafic de produits dopants		1997	No	Enquête judiciaire
Bouillon Marc	EPO		1996	No	Enquête judiciaire
Derique David	Anabolic	Vendée international Classic	1996	Yes	Positive control

For a good understanding, the following should be kept in mind:

We've done our best to piece together the history of the teams beyond their name changes. This would not have been possible without the considerable work of three websites: www.museociclismo.it, www.memoire-du-cyclisme.eu and www.velorooms.com.
For each team, this list cannot be exhaustive. Indeed, our doping directory , from which the cases listed here are taken, is by nature incomplete. Moreover, we have not been able to precisely date some doping cases. As a result, these cannot be linked with certainty to such or such a team. They therefore do not appear in this list.
By doping case, one must understand the positive tests, the reports of deficiency , the disciplinary, parliamentary or judicial inquiries or confessions. When we do not know the outcome, we indicate it in the penalty column. We also mention a number of cases for which there was no sanction. This is the case, for example, of late confessions which did not lead to any prosecution.

If you notice any errors or omissions, please let us know by sending a message here .